- Home
- Products
- Process
- Members
- About
- Publications
- Press
- Newsroom
- CRA Welcomes Robert Swinford
- Corn Refiners Association Celebrates 100 Years
- Kohler Accepts Position at GMA
- Statement on the Food & Drug Administration Denial of Petition
- Study Relies on Debunked Research and Pure Speculation In Effort To Blame HFCS for Autism
- CRA Responds to Colony Collapse Disorder Claims
- Sugar Industry Ramps Up Misinformation Campaign
- Corn Refiners Ask Court to Dismiss Case
- Response to UCLA Rat Study
- Statement on the New York State Supreme Court’s Decision
- New Study on Fructose Ignores “Real World” Dietary Habits
- New Study Alleging HFCS-Diabetes Link is Flawed and Misleading
- Sugar Industry’s Latest Move
- Sugar Industry in a Stretch: Pitching New Study To Create False Scientific Controversy
- Corn Refiners Counter Sue the Sugar Association
- CRA Statement on GHSU Study
- Inconclusive Fructose Study
- Sugar Lawyers Refile Claims Already Rejected By Court
- Sugar Industry “Shopping Mall” Survey Misleads Consumers
- Corn Refiners Applaud Passage of Free Trade Agreements
- Court Rejects Key Portions of Lawsuit
- Corn Refiners Urge Passage of Free Trade Agreements
- HFCS & Sugar: Studies Show No Meaningful Difference
- Corn Refiners Respond to Lawsuit
- Heart Disease Study Fails to Prove Increased Risk Factors
- CRA Commends Signing of Mexico Trucking Agreement
- Fairfax Schools Chocolate Milk Sweetener
- Corn Refiners Applaud Trade Accord with Colombia
- Deregulation of Corn Amylase Biotech Trait
- Mexico Trucking Dispute
- CRA Welcomes Korean Deal
- JASN Fructose Review
- New Study – Added Sugars & Heart Disease
- Focus on Fructose Misplaced
- Sugar Content Study Flawed
- CRA Petitions FDA for Use of "Corn Sugar"
- Sara Lee Swaps Corn Sugar for Cane/Beet Sugar
- Fructose Pancreatic Cancer Study
- Metabolic Syndrome Research
- Summer Sweets
- Furan Study Misleading
- Gross Errors in Princeton Study
- Duke Statement Flaws
- CBS News Health Report
- Legal Merits of CRA's Right to Educate Consumers about HFCS Unaffected by Judge's Ruling on Member Companies
- Sugar Industry Denies Misleading Public Despite Pay-for-Play Media Reports
- Corn Refiners Association Welcomes New President
- News Archives
- HFCS-Free False Health Halo
- HMF, Honeybees and HFCS
- AHA Study Leads to Confusion
- AMA Decision on HFCS
- Beverages & Feelings of Hunger
- Bipartisan Approach Aplauded
- Confusion About Sugars
- Court Ruling on Natural Labeling
- CRA Applauds Michener Appointment
- CRA Applauds Terpstra Nomination
- CRA Applauds Vilsack Nomination
- CRA Statement – King Corn
- Do Fad Diets Really Work?
- Expert Assessment: HFCS Mercury
- FDA Natural Clarification
- Fructose Confused With HFCS
- HFCS Mercury Study Flawed
- HFCS Mercury Study Outdated
- HFCS Natural Labeling
- High Fructose Corn Syrup & Mercury
- ILSI-USDA Workshop on HFCS
- Moms' Nutrition Concerns
- NBC News Nutrition Report
- No Reason to Switch
- Outstanding Researchers Honored
- Peru Trade Deal
- Proposed Florida Legislation
- Pure Fructose Confused With HFCS
- Statement on Peru Trade Agreement
- Sweet Surprise
- Sweetener Reformulations
- Test Your Sweet-Smarts
- Tests Find No Quantifiable Mercury
- Tips for Healthier Summer Eating
- Wake Up & Smell the Coffee
- Position Statements
- Newsroom
Statement of
Audrae Erickson, Corn Refiners Association
Agricultural Coalition for U.S.-Peru Trade Press Conference
September 27, 2007
The U.S. food and agribusiness sector has been standing on the sidelines of an important skirmish that is taking place in the Western Hemisphere. Our team is not the first string, or even the second string – we more closely resemble benchwarmers. And what is the game we so longingly want to play in?
The race to compete in our own backyard.
Congress has an opportunity to even the score for the U.S. food and agribusiness sector by voting in favor of the trade deal with Peru and closely following suit with Panama, Colombia and finally Korea.
The rules of the game have been decided. The referee has blown the whistle. Our team is suited up, but our opponents have the upper hand because we have not been cleared for play.
And what is at stake in this game?
For those of us that process commodities, we see an opportunity for double gains. Our corn gluten meal & feed, corn starch and oil, and sweetener exports will soon face no tariffs in Peru, Panama, Colombia and later Korea. Soybean meal, wheat flour and others have similar stories to tell. We benefit from increased exports of our products to these markets in the first instance. Then, when our value added exports of meat, dairy and processed food products grow –we sell more feed and food ingredients here at home.
The economic gains from the Peru agreement present a win-win for our two countries and for the region. The trade accord with Peru is a stepping stone to the Western Hemisphere that we hope to build on with ratified agreements with Panama and Colombia. Rest assured that our competitors are already there and that Asian powerhouses are working now to strike deals in this region for their food and agricultural sectors.
And so we are asking Congress to vote on the winning team by passing the Peru agreement and soon Panama, Colombia and Korea. We want the opportunity to see meaningful two-way trade with these countries. We will perform well in these markets.
But first, Congress needs to let us get into the game.

