- Home
- Products
- Process
- Members
- About
- Publications
- Press
- Newsroom
- CRA Welcomes Robert Swinford
- Corn Refiners Association Celebrates 100 Years
- Kohler Accepts Position at GMA
- Statement on the Food & Drug Administration Denial of Petition
- Study Relies on Debunked Research and Pure Speculation In Effort To Blame HFCS for Autism
- CRA Responds to Colony Collapse Disorder Claims
- Sugar Industry Ramps Up Misinformation Campaign
- Corn Refiners Ask Court to Dismiss Case
- Response to UCLA Rat Study
- Statement on the New York State Supreme Court’s Decision
- New Study on Fructose Ignores “Real World” Dietary Habits
- New Study Alleging HFCS-Diabetes Link is Flawed and Misleading
- Sugar Industry’s Latest Move
- Sugar Industry in a Stretch: Pitching New Study To Create False Scientific Controversy
- Corn Refiners Counter Sue the Sugar Association
- CRA Statement on GHSU Study
- Inconclusive Fructose Study
- Sugar Lawyers Refile Claims Already Rejected By Court
- Sugar Industry “Shopping Mall” Survey Misleads Consumers
- Corn Refiners Applaud Passage of Free Trade Agreements
- Court Rejects Key Portions of Lawsuit
- Corn Refiners Urge Passage of Free Trade Agreements
- HFCS & Sugar: Studies Show No Meaningful Difference
- Corn Refiners Respond to Lawsuit
- Heart Disease Study Fails to Prove Increased Risk Factors
- CRA Commends Signing of Mexico Trucking Agreement
- Fairfax Schools Chocolate Milk Sweetener
- Corn Refiners Applaud Trade Accord with Colombia
- Deregulation of Corn Amylase Biotech Trait
- Mexico Trucking Dispute
- CRA Welcomes Korean Deal
- JASN Fructose Review
- New Study – Added Sugars & Heart Disease
- Focus on Fructose Misplaced
- Sugar Content Study Flawed
- CRA Petitions FDA for Use of "Corn Sugar"
- Sara Lee Swaps Corn Sugar for Cane/Beet Sugar
- Fructose Pancreatic Cancer Study
- Metabolic Syndrome Research
- Summer Sweets
- Furan Study Misleading
- Gross Errors in Princeton Study
- Duke Statement Flaws
- CBS News Health Report
- Legal Merits of CRA's Right to Educate Consumers about HFCS Unaffected by Judge's Ruling on Member Companies
- Sugar Industry Denies Misleading Public Despite Pay-for-Play Media Reports
- Corn Refiners Association Welcomes New President
- News Archives
- HFCS-Free False Health Halo
- HMF, Honeybees and HFCS
- AHA Study Leads to Confusion
- AMA Decision on HFCS
- Beverages & Feelings of Hunger
- Bipartisan Approach Aplauded
- Confusion About Sugars
- Court Ruling on Natural Labeling
- CRA Applauds Michener Appointment
- CRA Applauds Terpstra Nomination
- CRA Applauds Vilsack Nomination
- CRA Statement – King Corn
- Do Fad Diets Really Work?
- Expert Assessment: HFCS Mercury
- FDA Natural Clarification
- Fructose Confused With HFCS
- HFCS Mercury Study Flawed
- HFCS Mercury Study Outdated
- HFCS Natural Labeling
- High Fructose Corn Syrup & Mercury
- ILSI-USDA Workshop on HFCS
- Moms' Nutrition Concerns
- NBC News Nutrition Report
- No Reason to Switch
- Outstanding Researchers Honored
- Peru Trade Deal
- Proposed Florida Legislation
- Pure Fructose Confused With HFCS
- Statement on Peru Trade Agreement
- Sweet Surprise
- Sweetener Reformulations
- Test Your Sweet-Smarts
- Tests Find No Quantifiable Mercury
- Tips for Healthier Summer Eating
- Wake Up & Smell the Coffee
- Position Statements
- Newsroom
Sugar Industry Denies Misleading Public Despite Media Reports Exposing “Pay-for-Play” Campaign Against Corn Refiners
Lobbying Group Incredibly Evokes “Free Speech” After Suing to Censor Consumer Education
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 30, 2012
CONTACT: David Knowles
Mobile (410) 810-4444
WASHINGTON, October 30 – In court documents filed yesterday, attorneys for the U.S. sugar industry tried to deny that The Sugar Association is deceiving consumers into believing that processed table sugar is safer and more healthful than high fructose corn syrup, even as several recent media stories revealed they are funding secretive campaigns to attack HFCS and other sweeteners.
In the newest issue of Mother Jones, the cover story “Sweet Little Lies” chronicles the sugar industry’s decades-long use of paid-for allies to mislead the news media, public and regulators through front groups and questionable science. Just weeks ago, a Bloomberg investigative reporter revealed that The Sugar Association has recently paid $300,000 to the phony consumer group, Citizens for Health, to launch petitions and other sponsored activities to stir-up baseless consumer concerns about high fructose corn syrup.
“What these recent news reports confirm is The Sugar Association and its members have spent huge amounts of money to buy the support of consumer front groups to attack high fructose corn syrup and other sweeteners,” said Audrae Erickson, president of the Corn Refiners Association. “Their litigation against our education campaign is nothing more than another ploy to sell more processed sugar by attempting to censor our speech and it will not prevail.”
Although The Sugar Association’s original lawsuit against The Corn Refiners Association explicitly is an attempt to block further consumer education about high fructose corn syrup, in a sudden reversal, the sugar lobby now is evoking the “cherished right” of free speech in defense of their actions.
“It is remarkable that The Sugar Association has suddenly stumbled upon the principle of free speech, given how hard they have tried to censor our consumer education program,” Erickson said. “Perhaps their new found belief in freedom of speech will motivate them to drop their self-serving lawsuit to silence our efforts to educate the public about high fructose corn syrup.”
The motion is in response to a countersuit brought by member companies of the Corn Refiners Association in early September. The counterclaim presented evidence showing that “The Sugar Association has worked to perpetuate the myth that high fructose corn syrup uniquely contributes to obesity and other health problems, preying on consumers’ food fears and diverting attention away from the real issue – that Americans should reduce their consumption of all added sugars and calories in general.”
The countersuit is part of the corn refining industry’s response to an April 2011 lawsuit brought by The Sugar Association that is intended to prevent CRA from educating consumers on the widely accepted fact that high fructose corn syrup and table sugar are nutritionally equivalent. In previous statements, CRA has characterized The Sugar Association’s lawsuit as part of a “silencing campaign” and has said the group is “trying to censor our efforts to communicate the simplest and more meaningful fact about our product: It’s a sugar.” The counter-claim states that The Sugar Association is hoping its false statements “cause food and beverage manufacturers to replace high fructose corn syrup with processed sugar…”
Contact: David Knowles
(410) 810-4444
Read the Mother Jones article “Sweet Little Lies” (note free registration is required to access article):http://www.motherjones.com/toc/2012/11
Read the Bloomberg article “Stealth Lobbying Used to Tout Sugar Over Rival Corn Syrup”: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-18/stealth-lobbying-used-to-tout-sugar-over-rival-corn-syrup.html
Read more about the case on SweetSurprise.com: http://sweetsurprise.com/western-sugar-litigation
- ### -
The Corn Refiners Association (CRA) is the national trade association representing the corn refining (wet milling) industry of the United States. CRA and its predecessors have served this important segment of American agribusiness since 1913. Corn refiners manufacture sweeteners, ethanol, starch, bioproducts, corn oil and feed products from corn components such as starch, oil, protein and fiber.
Visit us on the Web at www.Corn.org
