- Home
- Products
- Process
- Members
- About
- Publications
- Press
- Newsroom
- CRA Welcomes Robert Swinford
- Corn Refiners Association Celebrates 100 Years
- Kohler Accepts Position at GMA
- Statement on the Food & Drug Administration Denial of Petition
- Study Relies on Debunked Research and Pure Speculation In Effort To Blame HFCS for Autism
- CRA Responds to Colony Collapse Disorder Claims
- Sugar Industry Ramps Up Misinformation Campaign
- Corn Refiners Ask Court to Dismiss Case
- Response to UCLA Rat Study
- Statement on the New York State Supreme Court’s Decision
- New Study on Fructose Ignores “Real World” Dietary Habits
- New Study Alleging HFCS-Diabetes Link is Flawed and Misleading
- Sugar Industry’s Latest Move
- Sugar Industry in a Stretch: Pitching New Study To Create False Scientific Controversy
- Corn Refiners Counter Sue the Sugar Association
- CRA Statement on GHSU Study
- Inconclusive Fructose Study
- Sugar Lawyers Refile Claims Already Rejected By Court
- Sugar Industry “Shopping Mall” Survey Misleads Consumers
- Corn Refiners Applaud Passage of Free Trade Agreements
- Court Rejects Key Portions of Lawsuit
- Corn Refiners Urge Passage of Free Trade Agreements
- HFCS & Sugar: Studies Show No Meaningful Difference
- Corn Refiners Respond to Lawsuit
- Heart Disease Study Fails to Prove Increased Risk Factors
- CRA Commends Signing of Mexico Trucking Agreement
- Fairfax Schools Chocolate Milk Sweetener
- Corn Refiners Applaud Trade Accord with Colombia
- Deregulation of Corn Amylase Biotech Trait
- Mexico Trucking Dispute
- CRA Welcomes Korean Deal
- JASN Fructose Review
- New Study – Added Sugars & Heart Disease
- Focus on Fructose Misplaced
- Sugar Content Study Flawed
- CRA Petitions FDA for Use of "Corn Sugar"
- Sara Lee Swaps Corn Sugar for Cane/Beet Sugar
- Fructose Pancreatic Cancer Study
- Metabolic Syndrome Research
- Summer Sweets
- Furan Study Misleading
- Gross Errors in Princeton Study
- Duke Statement Flaws
- CBS News Health Report
- Legal Merits of CRA's Right to Educate Consumers about HFCS Unaffected by Judge's Ruling on Member Companies
- Sugar Industry Denies Misleading Public Despite Pay-for-Play Media Reports
- Corn Refiners Association Welcomes New President
- News Archives
- HFCS-Free False Health Halo
- HMF, Honeybees and HFCS
- AHA Study Leads to Confusion
- AMA Decision on HFCS
- Beverages & Feelings of Hunger
- Bipartisan Approach Aplauded
- Confusion About Sugars
- Court Ruling on Natural Labeling
- CRA Applauds Michener Appointment
- CRA Applauds Terpstra Nomination
- CRA Applauds Vilsack Nomination
- CRA Statement – King Corn
- Do Fad Diets Really Work?
- Expert Assessment: HFCS Mercury
- FDA Natural Clarification
- Fructose Confused With HFCS
- HFCS Mercury Study Flawed
- HFCS Mercury Study Outdated
- HFCS Natural Labeling
- High Fructose Corn Syrup & Mercury
- ILSI-USDA Workshop on HFCS
- Moms' Nutrition Concerns
- NBC News Nutrition Report
- No Reason to Switch
- Outstanding Researchers Honored
- Peru Trade Deal
- Proposed Florida Legislation
- Pure Fructose Confused With HFCS
- Statement on Peru Trade Agreement
- Sweet Surprise
- Sweetener Reformulations
- Test Your Sweet-Smarts
- Tests Find No Quantifiable Mercury
- Tips for Healthier Summer Eating
- Wake Up & Smell the Coffee
- Position Statements
- Newsroom
HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP:
|
|||||||||||
|
Year |
Primary weight (market level)* |
Loss from retail/institutional to consumer level |
Weight at consumer level |
Loss at consumer level (uneaten food, spoilage, etc.) |
Per capita consumption (adjusted for loss) |
Calories per serving |
Serving weight |
Calories consumed daily** |
Servings (teaspoons) consumed daily*** |
||
|
lbs/yr |
percent |
lbs/yr |
percent |
lbs/yr |
oz/daily |
g/daily |
number |
grams |
number |
teaspoons |
|
| 1970 |
0.5 |
11.0 |
0.5 |
20.0 |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
2 |
0.1 |
| 1975 |
4.9 |
11.0 |
4.3 |
20.0 |
3.5 |
0.2 |
4.3 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
16 |
1.0 |
| 1980 |
19.0 |
11.0 |
16.9 |
20.0 |
13.5 |
0.6 |
16.8 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
64 |
4.0 |
| 1985 |
45.2 |
11.0 |
40.2 |
20.0 |
32.2 |
1.4 |
40.0 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
152 |
9.5 |
| 1990 |
49.6 |
11.0 |
44.1 |
20.0 |
35.3 |
1.5 |
43.9 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
167 |
10.4 |
| 1995 |
57.6 |
11.0 |
51.3 |
20.0 |
41.0 |
1.8 |
51.0 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
194 |
12.1 |
| 1996 |
57.8 |
11.0 |
51.4 |
20.0 |
41.1 |
1.8 |
51.1 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
195 |
12.2 |
| 1997 |
60.4 |
11.0 |
53.7 |
20.0 |
43.0 |
1.9 |
53.4 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
204 |
12.7 |
| 1998 |
61.9 |
11.0 |
55.1 |
20.0 |
44.1 |
1.9 |
54.8 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
209 |
13.0 |
| 1999 |
63.7 |
11.0 |
56.7 |
20.0 |
45.4 |
2.0 |
56.4 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
215 |
13.4 |
| 2000 |
62.7 |
11.0 |
55.8 |
20.0 |
44.6 |
2.0 |
55.4 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
211 |
13.2 |
| 2001 |
62.6 |
11.0 |
55.7 |
20.0 |
44.6 |
2.0 |
55.4 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
211 |
13.2 |
| 2002 |
62.9 |
11.0 |
56.0 |
20.0 |
44.8 |
2.0 |
55.6 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
212 |
13.2 |
| 2003 |
61.0 |
11.0 |
54.2 |
20.0 |
43.4 |
1.9 |
53.9 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
205 |
12.8 |
| 2004 |
59.9 |
11.0 |
53.3 |
20.0 |
42.7 |
1.9 |
53.0 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
202 |
12.6 |
| 2005 |
59.2 |
11.0 |
52.7 |
20.0 |
42.2 |
1.8 |
52.4 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
200 |
12.5 |
| 2006 |
58.3 |
11.0 |
51.9 |
20.0 |
41.5 |
1.8 |
51.6 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
197 |
12.3 |
| 2007 |
56.3 |
11.0 |
50.1 |
20.0 |
40.1 |
1.8 |
49.8 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
190 |
11.9 |
| 2008 |
53.1 |
11.0 |
47.3 |
20.0 |
37.8 |
1.7 |
47.0 |
16.0 |
4.2 |
179 |
11.2 |
* U.S. per capita HFCS estimated deliveries for domestic food and beverage use.
** Number of daily teaspoons multiplied by calories per serving.
*** Grams per day divided by serving weight.
Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service
